Skip to main content

Difference between REST API and SOAP API

By Gourav S

 

There is no direct comparison between SOAP and REST APIs. But there are some points to be listed below which makes you choose better between these two web services. Here are: 

  • SOAP stands for Simple Object Access Protocol and REST stands for Representational State Transfer.
  • Since SOAP is a protocol, it follows a strict standard to allow communication between the client and the server whereas REST is an architectural style that doesn’t follow any strict standard but follows six constraints defined by Roy Fielding in 2000. Those constraints are – Uniform Interface, Client-Server, Stateless, Cacheable, Layered System, Code on Demand.
  • SOAP uses only XML for exchanging information in its message format whereas REST is not restricted to XML and its the choice of implementer which Media-Type to use like XML, JSON, Plain-text. Moreover, REST can use SOAP protocol but SOAP cannot use REST.
  • On behalf of services interfaces to business logic, SOAP uses @WebService whereas REST instead of using interfaces uses URI like @Path.
  • SOAP is difficult to implement and it requires more bandwidth whereas REST is easy to implement and requires less bandwidth such as smartphones.
  • Benefits of SOAP over REST as SOAP has ACID compliance transaction. Some of the applications require transaction ability which is accepted by SOAP whereas REST lacks in it.
  • On the basis of Security, SOAP has SSL( Secure Socket Layer) and WS-security whereas REST has SSL and HTTPS. In the case of Bank Account Password, Card Number, etc. SOAP is preferred over REST. The security issue is all about your application requirement, you have to build security on your own. It’s about what type of protocol you use.
  • SOAP cannot make use of REST since SOAP is a protocol without any architectural pattern. REST can make use of SOAP because it is an architectural pattern having protocol.

Differentiating between SOAP API and REST API

SOAP API

REST API

Relies on SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol)Relies on REST (Representational State Transfer) architecture using HTTP.
Transports data in standard XML format.Generally transports data in JSON. It is based on URI. Because REST follows stateless model, REST does not enforces message format as XML or JSON etc.
Because it is XML based and relies on SOAP, it works with WSDLIt works with GET, POST, PUT, DELETE
Works over HTTP, HTTPS, SMTP, XMPPWorks over HTTP and HTTPS
Highly structured/typed

Less structured -> less bulky data

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Microservices design patterns

By Gourav S
Microservices design pattern Next :  saga-design-pattern-microservices
Post a Comment
Read more

Runtime Fabric (RTF)

By Gourav S
MuleSoft's Anypoint Runtime Fabric (RTF) has many features that help with deployment and management of Mule applications: Deployment: RTF can deploy applications to any environment, including on-premises, in the cloud, or in a hybrid setup. It can also automatically deploy Mule runtimes into containers. Isolation: RTF can isolate applications by running a separate Mule runtime server for each application. Scaling: RTF can scale applications across multiple replicas. Fail-over: RTF can automatically fail over applications. Monitoring and logging: RTF has built-in monitoring and logging capabilities to help teams troubleshoot issues and gain insights into application performance. Containerization: RTF supports containerization, which allows applications to be packaged with their dependencies and run consistently across different environments. Integration: RTF can integrate with services like SaveMyLeads to automate data flow between applications. Management: RTF can be managed with A...
1 comment
Read more

Integration Design Patterns

By Gourav S
Understanding Integration Design Patterns: Integration design patterns serve as reusable templates for solving common integration problems encountered in software development. They encapsulate best practices and proven solutions, empowering developers to architect complex systems with confidence. These patterns abstract away the complexities of integration, promoting modularity, flexibility, and interoperability across components. Most Common Integration Design Patterns: Point-to-Point Integration: Point-to-Point Integration involves establishing direct connections between individual components. While simple to implement, this pattern can lead to tight coupling and scalability issues as the number of connections grows. Visualizing this pattern, imagine a network of interconnected nodes, each communicating directly with specific endpoints. Publish-Subscribe (Pub/Sub) Integration: Pub/Sub Integration decouples producers of data (publishers) from consumers (subscribers) through a central ...
Post a Comment
Read more